Mentorship Index

Where learning meets leadership.

Objective: Ensure students receive adequate, consistent, and personalized attention from faculty or assigned mentors.

Metrics:        

  • Average mentor-to-mentee ratio (e.g., 1:10, 1:15).
  • Minimum and actual number of mentoring sessions conducted per semester.
  • Documentation of session outcomes (goal-setting, progress reports).
  • Training provided to mentors (on counseling, confidentiality, etc.).

Benchmark Use:
A mentor-mentee ratio of 1:10–1:15 is considered optimal, with at least 2 formal sessions per semester.

Objective: Foster community-based support where senior students assist juniors in navigating academic and campus life.

Metrics:

  • Number and structure of peer mentoring programs (academic, emotional, social).
  • Percentage of first-year students assigned a peer mentor.
  • Peer mentor selection, training, and performance evaluation.
  • Impact measured via mentee feedback and academic performance trends.

Benchmark Use:
Institutions often aim for 100% peer mentor coverage for new entrants and structured training for peer mentors.

Objective: Bring real-world perspectives and career insights into the academic environment.

Metrics:

  • Number of guest lectures, mentorship panels, or fireside chats annually.
  • Diversity of industry representation (pharma, clinical research, regulatory affairs, etc.).
  • Student participation and feedback scores.
  • Follow-up interactions such as Q&A sessions or one-on-one meetings.

Benchmark Use:
Aim for at least 6–8 industry mentorship events per year with >75% student participation.

Objective: Leverage the experience of alumni to guide current students in career pathways, higher education, and industry preparation.

Metrics:

  • Number of active alumni mentors and mentee engagements.
  • Types of mentoring formats (webinars, shadowing, 1:1 sessions).
  • Alumni mentor diversity (career stages, sectors, geographies).
  • Outcomes tracked (internships secured, career clarity, grad school admissions).

Benchmark Use:              

Objective: Provide individualized guidance tailored to student interests, strengths, and career aspirations.

Metrics:

  • Availability of trained academic/career counselors.
  • Ratio of counselors to students.
  • Range of services offered (career assessments, resume clinics, interview prep).
  • Integration of technology (career platforms, psychometric tools).

Benchmark Use:
One counselor per 500 students, with at least 70% of final-year students having attended one or more career guidance sessions.

Objective: Assess student satisfaction and perceived value of mentorship support.

Metrics:

  • Anonymous feedback on mentor availability, approachability, and helpfulness.
  • Improvement in academic confidence and career clarity (pre/post program surveys).
  • Grievance redressal and escalation processes related to mentorship issues.

Benchmark Use:

80% of students should report satisfaction with mentorship, with improvement plans for scores <70%.

Use of the Mentorship Index

  • Institutional Self-Assessment: For internal quality audits, NAAC/NBA accreditation reports.
  • Strategic Development: Identify mentorship gaps and scale successful formats (e.g., alumni engagement).
  • Student Success Initiatives: Improve retention, reduce stress, and enhance career outcomes.

Mentorship Index (MI)

Purpose: Measures the level of mentorship engagement within a class, including both formal mentorship sessions and informal guidance.

Formula for Mentorship Index:

MI = (Number of mentorship sessions attended by students ÷ Total students in class) × 100

Steps:

  1. Numerator: Count the number of mentorship sessions attended by students in the class (could be one-on-one mentoring, group mentoring, peer mentoring, etc.).
  2. Denominator: Total number of students in the class.
  3. Multiply by 100 to get the percentage.

Convert to 0–5 Scale:

Mentorship Index (%)

0-5 Scale Rating

Interpretation

0–20%

0

Very Low Mentorship Engagement

21–40%

1

Low Mentorship Engagement

41–60%

2

Moderate Mentorship Engagement

61–80%

3

High Mentorship Engagement

81–100%

4

Very High Mentorship Engagement

>100%

5

Exceptional Mentorship Engagement